Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
Date
Msg-id 20181104000906.GB1743@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 12:30:15PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-11-03 16:24:28 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2018-Nov-03, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Well, you've guaranteed that already.  Now 11 will be different from
>>> 11.1, and tables will be different from indexes until somebody goes
>>> and makes that consistent again.
>>
>> Nobody is running 11.0 in production.
>
> Uh, I know of people doing so.

My understanding of the term GA is that anything marked as GA is
considered enough stable for production use, and that beta releases are
here for testing.  So I don't get the argument.  And you have made
partitioned indexes now inconsistent with partitioned tables.

Seeing this stuff discussed and committed in haste gives me the sad
face.

:(
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: LAM JUN RONG
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improvements to "Getting started" tutorial for GoogleCode-in task
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to resetstatistics of a specific query