Re: Log timestamps at higher resolution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Log timestamps at higher resolution
Date
Msg-id 20181023234647.GF1658@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Log timestamps at higher resolution  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Log timestamps at higher resolution  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:11:18AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> That's an interesting point.  pgbadger is the only one I recall using
> that's still maintained. Which others would it be useful to test?

There could be private solutions as well.  My take is that we should use
separate letters and not change the existing ones or we'll get
complains.

> Also, do we have tests--or at least ideas of how to
> test--functionality relating to logging? I was a little bit taken
> aback by the fact that `make check-world` passed after the change.

This requires server-level changes where a TAP test is usually adapted,
and there is no test for logging yet.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks