Hi,
On 2018-10-20 12:39:55 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> - I agree with Stephen's point that we should decide if a file has
> checksums or not in a single place, and that we should use the same
> logic for base backups and pg_verify_checksums.
To be clear, I wholeheartedly agree on that. We probably only want to
tackle that for "is checksummable file" in a backpatchable fashion, but
we probably should move to having more common infrastructure like that.
> So what I think we ought to do is the following:
> - Start a new thread, this one about TAP tests is not adapted.
> - Add in src/common/relpath.c the API from d55241af called
> isRelFileName(), make use of it in the base backup code, and basically
> remove is_checksummed_file() and the checksum skip list.
I think it probably shouldn't quite be that as an API. The code should
not just check whether the file matches a pattern, but also importantly
needs to exclude files that are in a temp tablespace. isRelFileName()
doesn't quite describe an API meaning that. I assume we should keep
something like isRelFileName() but use an API ontop of that that also
exclude temp files / relations.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 20:48:02 -0700
Message-ID: <87in1xmg7h.fsf@alap4.lan>
