Re: Large writable variables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Large writable variables
Date
Msg-id 20181016062210.wf3lexinv32xkumq@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large writable variables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-10-16 01:49:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > [ let's rearrange the GUC structs ]
> 
> I find it hard to believe that the API breaks you'll cause for extensions
> are a good trade for a few kB reduction in the size of the .data segment.

I'm doubtful that it's worth it too. But more because it seems like a
fair bit of work. I don't think that many extensions use guc_tables.h -
shouldn't most use guc.h, which wouldn't be affected?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Large writable variables
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Large writable variables