On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 06:04:11PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> culicidae tests EXEC_BACKEND, so there's an explanation as to why it
> sometimes behaves differently. But here I don't immediately see how
> that'd matter. Probably still worth verifying that it's not somehow
> caused by that.
Thanks, that's the point of detail I needed about culicidae (you will
need to explain me one day face-to-face how you pronounce it). I have
been able to reproduce the problem, and that's a bug within
pg_verify_checksums as it fails to consider that config_exec_params is
not a file it should scan when using EXEC_BACKEND. The same can happen
with config_exec_params.new.
The attached, which fixes the issue for me, needs to be back-patched to
v11.
--
Michael
