Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Date
Msg-id 20181009213709.6dpkhlqdppnjpzxs@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-10-09 17:27:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > As discussed below (at [1]), I think we should remove $subject.  I plan
> > to do so, unless somebody protests soon-ish.  I thought it'd be better
> > to call attention to this in a new thread, to make sure people had a
> > chance to object.
> 
> I complained about this already on the other thread, I think, but:
> I do not think we should remove timeofday().  It's unrelated to these
> datatypes and it offers functionality that isn't quite duplicated
> elsewhere.

Ok.  I find it a somewhat weird function, but I agree it's not strongly
related. It only came up because it's implemented in nabstime.c.  Moving
it to utils/adt/timestamp.c seems to make the most sense?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel