On 2018-Oct-07, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 10:15:32PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Pushed to 11 and master. I'm not convinced that it's a good idea to
> > mess with 10 at this point -- the partitioning code is rather completely
> > different already ...
>
> While I definitely agree with you to not mess up with this portion of
> the partitioning code for REL_10_STABLE, I think that we have a good set
> of arguments to get the regression test into this branch. This
> particular case has been broken while developing v11, hence it would be
> nice to get the insurance that any future bug fix applying to
> REL_10_STABLE does not break it again.
Good point. I cannot do that today, but if you want to, please go
ahead.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
