On 2018-Oct-03, Michael Paquier wrote:
> There could be an argument for having an automatic more within this
> scheme, still I am not really a fan of this. When somebody integrates
> pg_upgrade within an upgrade framework, they would likely test if
> cloning actually works, bumping immediately on a failure, no? I'd like
> to think that copy should be the default, cloning being available as an
> option. Cloning is not supported on many filesystems anyway..
I'm not clear what interface are you proposing. Maybe they would just
use the clone-or-fail mode, and note whether it fails? If that's not
it, please explain.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
