On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 09:19:13AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> Additionally put an upper limit threshold on the number of combinations to
> check, fairly large by default?
>
> If first threshold is exceeded, could consider checking out a few more
> selected at random from paths not yet checked, to avoid any bias caused by
> stopping a systematic search. This might prove important when N! is fairly
> large.
Please note that the latest patch available does not apply, so this has
been moved to next CF 2018-11, waiting for input from its author.
--
Michael
