On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:59:20PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> Without further ado, I present a patch to implement pg_ls_archive_status(),
> which fills this gap. I believe the function name is long enough and we
> don't need an extra wal in there. The patch is based on a very recent
> master (just pulled and merged), but does not include the catversion
> bump (avoid conflict on merge).
Okay, could you add this patch to the next commit fest? Here it is:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/20/
--
Michael
