On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> One more thought - when running similar tools on a live system, it's
> usually a good idea to limit the impact by throttling the throughput. As
> the verification runs in an independent process it can't reuse the
> vacuum-like cost limit directly, but perhaps it could do something
> similar? Like, limit the number of blocks read/second, or so?
When it comes to such parameters, not using a number of blocks but
throttling with a value in bytes (kB or MB of course) speaks more to the
user. The past experience with checkpoint_segments is one example of
that. Converting that to a number of blocks internally would definitely
make sense the most sense. +1 for this idea.
--
Michael
