Greetings,
* Chris Travers (chris.travers@gmail.com) wrote:
> I said I would stand aside my objections after the last point I mentioned
> them but I did not feel that my particular objection and concern with
> regard to one specific sentence added got much of a hearing. This being
> said, it is genuinely hard to sort through the noise and try to reach the
> signal. I think the resurgence of the debate about whether we need a code
> of conduct made it very difficult to discuss specific objections to
> specific wording. So to be honest the breakdown was mutual.
I would ask that you, and anyone else who has a suggestion for how to
improve or revise the CoC, submit your ideas to the committee by
email'ing coc@postgresql.org.
As was discussed previously, the current CoC isn't written in stone and
it will be changed and amended as needed.
Thanks!
Stephen
