On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:36:31PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> It would be useful if we have a number of the options autovacuum
> workers could use but since there are only 2 I'm not sure we need the
> list-style.
Looking at what Sergei has proposed upthread again, using a
comma-separated list of options may be more painful for translators as
such lists really depend on the language, so I would be fine to commit
what has been added.
One last point though: we use anti-wraparound in already five places in
the docs, still I have sympathy for "to prevent wraparound" as well.
The brackets look rather useless to me, wouldn't it be better to remove
them? By doing so the longest message becomes:
"automatic aggressive vacuum to prevent wraparound of table blah.blah"
--
Michael
