Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions
Date
Msg-id 20180904220251.GL4184@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> > While hacking another patch, I have noticed that triggerring multiple
> > times in a row installcheck on test_pg_dump results in a failure because
> > it is missing clean up actions on the role regress_dump_test_role.
> > Roles are shared objects, so I think that we ought to not let traces of
> > it when doing any regression tests on a running instance.
>
> > Attached is a patch to clean up things.
>
> I'm confused.  Isn't the point of that script exactly to create a modified
> extension for testing pg_dump with?
>
> What I'd do is leave the final state as-is and add a "drop role if exists"
> at the start, similar to what some of the core regression tests do.

I've not followed this thread but based on Tom's response, I agree with
his suggestion of what to do here.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in ginRedoRecompress that causes opaque data on page to be overrun
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug fix for glibc broke freebsd build in REL_11_STABLE