Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module
Date
Msg-id 20180828023819.GA29157@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdwmodule
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:34:31PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I like the direction of your thinking, but it seems to me that this
> would cause a problem if you want to set search_path=foo,bar.

proconfig already handles such cases, that's what I was coming at.  We
could reuse most of what it does, no?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Postmaster doesn't send SIGTERM to bgworker during fast shutdownwhen pmState == PM_STARTUP
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Why hash OIDs?