Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date
Msg-id 20180821204936.tqdmjolkoo2sv5og@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-08-21 11:09:15 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > XP at least is essentially a dead platform for us. My animals are not
> > able to build anything after release 10.
> 
> I wouldn't think XP should even be on our list anymore. Microsoft hasn't
> supported it in 4 years.

XP isn't the only thing relevant here, vista and 2008 R1 are in the same
class.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shawn Debnath
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: SLRU to Buffer Cache
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)