Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Date
Msg-id 20180820031332.GF7403@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:13:51PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In the thread about Secure Transport we agreed to move the consideration
> of new SSL libraries to PG12.
>
> Here is my current patch, after all the refactorings.
>
> The status is that it works fine and could be used.
>
> There are two failures in the SSL tests that I cannot explain.  The
> tests are for some rather obscure configurations, so the changed
> behaviors are not obviously wrong, perhaps legitimate implementation
> differences.  But someone wrote those tests with a purpose (probably),
> so we should have some kind of explanation for the regressions.

Patch v6 of this thread is failing to apply.  Could you rebase?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)