Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work
Date
Msg-id 20180813152211.GN3326@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving + streaming to work  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
Greetings,

* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On August 13, 2018 4:59:32 PM GMT+02:00, Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists@chezphil.org> wrote:
>  but in general, I think it's still
> >possible
> >that the master will remove the segment that is needed to start
> >streaming.
>
> That's why I told you about replication slots....

This should really work even without replication slots though.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving + streaming to work
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15323: wal_keep_segments must be >= 1 for WAL archiving +streaming to work