Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4
Date
Msg-id 20180731221035.GE2791@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:26:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Updated patch applied through 9.3:
> >     https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/260fe9f2b02b67de1e5ff29faf123e4220586c43
> 
> This patch evidently broke buildfarm member jacana, although only
> in the 9.3 branch.  It's been failing with
> 
> Jul 28 23:22:29 Performing Consistency Checks
> Jul 28 23:22:29 -----------------------------
> Jul 28 23:22:29 Checking cluster versions                                   ok
> Jul 28 23:22:30 The system cannot find the path specified.
> Jul 28 23:22:30 
> Jul 28 23:22:30 The source cluster lacks cluster state information:
> Jul 28 23:22:30 Failure, exiting
> Jul 28 23:22:30 make: *** [check] Error 1

Well, that's interesting.  I have a test script that upgrades all
version combinations of Postgres from 9.3 to head and it worked for me. 
However, I now see that the tests for checking a live server were wrong,
and 9.3 must have a slightly different test than the others.  Fixes
applied.  Thanks for finding this so quickly.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4