On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 07:10:24PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I have just responded to your first patch (0001). Can you once again
> summarize what the 0002 exactly accomplishes? I think one of the
> goals is to fix the original problem reported in this thread and other
> is you have found the concurrency issue. Is it possible to have
> separate patches for those or you think they are interrelated and
> needs to be fixed together?
That would be nice. The last time I read this thread I have been rather
confused about what was being discussed, what were the set of problems,
and what was being fixed. Speaking of which, this is one of the bugfix
patches I wanted to look at once I have untanggled the autovacuum one
for temporary relations and the DOS issues with lock lookups.
--
Michael
