Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Date
Msg-id 20180723011828.kxxiexcoxrvopgft@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-07-23 02:02:51 +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> 
>  >> No response to my followup to you in 2+ weeks. Last call?
> 
>  Michael> FWIW, I don't have any objections with experimenting on HEAD,
>  Michael> but I would vote for letting 11 out of this.
> 
> Why?

Because that's the default assumption when considerint to committ a new
feature to a feature frozen branch?  I don't really have a strong
feeling about this specific case either way, personally. But it's still
the default assumption.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT breaks PostGIS
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: RE: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows