Re: missing toast table for pg_policy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
Date
Msg-id 20180717064632.GF3388@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing toast table for pg_policy  (John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: missing toast table for pg_policy  (John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 03:47:38PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> I hope you don't mind, but since it might be tedious to piece together
> the addenda I left behind in this thread, I thought it might be useful
> to update Joe's patch. The attached was rebased over the new
> regression test, passes the pg_upgrade test, and has a draft commit
> message.

I was just having a second look at this patch, and did a bit more tests
with pg_upgrade which passed.

+-- 2. pg_largeobject and pg_largeobject_metadata, to avoid problems
+-- with pg_upgrade
John, what's actually the failure that was seen here?  It would be nice
to see this patch committed but the reason here should be more
explicit about why this cannot happen.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kaye Ann Ignacio
Date:
Subject: foreign key to foreign table
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: file cloning in pg_upgrade and CREATE DATABASE