On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:44:45 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 03:35:53PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > I think it makes sense to remove unnecessary temporary WAL files although
> > I'm not sure how high the risk of ENOSPC is.
>
> It depends on how close to the partition size limit max_wal_size is set,
> and how much a system is unstable. Switching on/off a VM where Postgres
> is located can participate in that, as well as VM snapshots taken
> without memory (I work a lot on those as you can guess :D). Setting it
> to 70% of the partition size is what I imagine is the base, but I can
> imagine as well people setting it at 90% or more.
Thank you for your explaining this. I have understood the problem
you concern well.
Thanks,
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
