On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:31:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am not sure if it is much interesting to keep around this table set
> for pg_upgrade, so I would drop it. Except for that, the result looks
> fine. I'll double-check and wrap it tomorrow on HEAD and REL_11_STABLE.
> The optimizations mentioned sound interesting, though I would recommend
> to not risk the stability of v11 at this point, so let's keep them for
> v12~.
So at the end I have dropped the table from the test, and pushed the
patch to HEAD and REL_11_STABLE. Thanks David for the patch, and others
for the reviews.
--
Michael
