On 2018-Jul-03, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm not clear to why this is a problem? Seems like either behaviour can
> be argued for. I don't really have an opinion either way. I'd just
> remove the item from the open items list, I don't think we need to hold
> up the release for it?
After reading this more carefully, isn't the problem that as soon as you
get a slot into the 0/1 restart_lsn state, WAL recycling/deletion no
longer happens? That does sound like a bad thing to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
