Re: CREATE TABLE .. LIKE .. EXCLUDING documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 08:39:01 +0200
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:

> > On 29 Jun 2018, at 07:56, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:22:15 -0700
> > "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> ​Maybe try something like:
> >>
> >> It is legal to specify the same option multiple times - e.g., "INCLUDING
> >> option EXCLUDING option" - the outcome is whichever comes last in the
> >> command (i.e., in the example, option is excluded).
> >
> > Certainly. However, it seems to me that example is also redundant.
> > I rewrote this as follows:
> >
> > It is legal to specify multiple options for the same kind of object.
> > If they conflict, latter options always override former options.
> >
> > Does this make sense?
>
> I think this wording makes sense and is clear. Only found a small typo:
>
> +      This is tipically used after <literal>INCLUDING ALL</literal>.
>
> s/tipically/typically/

Thanks a lot.

I updated the patch.

>
> cheers ./daniel


--
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>