On 2018-Jun-28, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/27/18 23:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Another angle is that we're already in beta3 and there may be concerns
> > about altering catalog definition this late in the cycle. Anybody?
> > Maybe psql can just match tgisinternal triggers by name, and if one
> > match occurs then we assume it's a clone that should be listed as a
> > partition trigger.
>
> Couldn't psql chase the pg_depend links to find inherited triggers?
Yeah, I thought this would be exceedingly ugly, but apparently it's not
*that* bad -- see the attached patch, which relies on the fact that
triggers don't otherwise depend on other triggers. We don't use this
technique elsewhere in psql though.
I admit I'm inclined to go this route mostly because it's simpler.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
