On 2018-06-28 11:14:38 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I'm not sure pgsql-committers was the right audience. Cross-posting to
> pg-hackers.
>
> On 2018-Jun-28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > 2 Reported-by:
> > 5 Author:
> > 6 Reviewed-by:
> > 7 Tested-by:
>
> Should these include email addresses?
I'm not sure it's that helpful, they tend to be out of date pretty soon.
> I've also used "Diagnosed-by" to credit a person who spent time studying
> a bug's mechanism and how to fix it. Sometimes that's the same as
> Reported-by, but I think the weight is quite different.
Yea, same here.
> Apparently, there's a recent trend to credit patch authors using
> "Co-authored-by". Should we use that too?
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/41847267/
I just put multiple people into Authors, with order roughly implying the
amount of work. Don't really see a reason to split it off further?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
