Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
Date
Msg-id 20180620044755.GD19346@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 01:32:58PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Just a minor nit in the last sentence:
>
> "have to be from" -> "must be from / must belong to"

I think that both have the same meaning, but I am no native speaker so I
may be missing a nuance of some kind.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.