On 2018-06-08 19:16:49 +0000, Peter Da Silva wrote:
> On 6/8/18, 1:12 PM, "Andres Freund" <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I'm not terribly opposed to this, but I wonder if the much more
> pragmatic solution is to just occasionally call a database function that
> checks this? You could just run SELECT 1 occasionally :/
>
> After further discussion with our team:
>
> Would this work if the reason for it ignoring the cancel request is
> that it is already performing a long-running spi_exec with a large
> response?
Not sure I quite understand what you mean. You're thinking of the case
where you're processing rows one-by-one with a cursor? Or that a single
spi call takes a long while to process the query?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
