Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk
Date
Msg-id 20180605155027.GB10899@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 02:56:23PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On 5 June 2018 at 06:52, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > That part has gotten a bit easier since, because we have serialize /
> > deserialize operations for aggregates these days.
> 
> True. Although not all built in aggregates have those defined.

That is a SMoP which we could, at some point, enforce by requiring
that they always be defined.  Is there something other than round
tuits that's preventing that?

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: serge@rielau.com
Date:
Subject: RE: Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression