> On 07/05/18 05:47, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes:
>>> Does anybody think having in-memory query result cache in core is a
>>> good idea?
>> No.
>
> Agreed.
>
> You could probably write an extension for that, though. I think the
> planner hook and custom scans give you enough flexibility to do that
> without modifying the server code.
I have simulated the idea and I wonder how to implement the query
result cache on the streaming standby servers because no DML/DDL are
executed on standby servers, that makes it impossible to invalidate
the query cache. Probably the only way to allow to use the query cache
is,
1) Let invalidate the query cache on the primary server.
2) The cache storage needed to be on the external cache server like
memcached.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
