On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:07:41PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> I have to agree to go with this conservative approach for now. Although
> we might be able to evaluate the array elements by applying the coercion
> specified by ArrayCoerceExpr, let's save that as an improvement to be
> pursued later.
Thanks for confirming. Yes, non-volatile functions would be actually
safe, and we'd need to be careful about NULL handling as well, but
that's definitely out of scope for v11.
> FWIW, constraint exclusion wouldn't prune in this case either (that is, if
> you try this example with PG 10 or using HEAD as of the parent of
> 9fdb675fc5), but it doesn't crash like the new pruning code does.
Yeah, I have noticed that.
--
Michael
