Re: Fsync request queue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Fsync request queue
Date
Msg-id 20180430230850.xo25nx2vkbrzgyxb@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fsync request queue  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Fsync request queue  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-04-30 16:07:48 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >> Is this a problem in practice, though? I don't remember seeing any reports
> >> of the fsync queue filling up, after we got the code to compact it. I don't
> >> know if anyone has been looking for that, so that might also explain the
> >> absence of reports, though.
> >
> > It's probably hard to diagnose that as the origin of slow IO from the
> > outside. It's not exactly easy to diagnose that even if you know what's
> > going on.
> 
> True, but has anyone ever actually observed a non-zero
> pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend_fsync in the wild after the
> compaction queue stuff was added/backpatched?

Yes.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yuriy Zhuravlev
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues while building PG in MS Windows, using MSYS2 and MinGW-w64
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: EXECUTE does not process parameters