On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:50:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hmm, I thought we talked about changing such references to say 'JIT
> compilation' rather than just 'JIT'.
Perhaps. I recall that this has been mentioned already the last couple
of weeks on the JIT thread. Personally, I can see that JIT is listed as
an acronym in the docs with its meaning explained by a link to
wikipedia about just-in-time compilation, so I am fine with the use of
the acronym. "JIT" is actually used without the <acronym> markup in
config.sgml. I think that at least this part should be fixed.
At the end that would be mainly Andres' call? Do you think that an open
item would be adapted?
--
Michael
