On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 12:45:23 +0200
Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com> wrote:
> > Thank you, pushed with some editorization and renaming
> > text_startswith to starts_with
>
> I am sorry for not noticing this before, but what is the point of this
> operator? It seems to me we are only making the prefix searching
> business, which is already complicated, more complicated.
Hi.
>
> Also, the new operator is not documented on SQL String Functions and
> Operators table. It is not supported by btree text_pattern_ops or
> btree indexes with COLLATE "C". It is not defined for "citext", so
> people would get wrong results. It doesn't use pg_trgm indexes
> whereas LIKE can.
It is mentioned in documentation, look for "starts_with" function.
Currently it's working with spgist indexes which fact is pointed out in
the documentation too. I was going to add btree support but it would
require a new strategy so it will be matter of another patch. I think
this operator could be used in LIKE instead of current weird comparison
operators.
--
---
Ildus Kurbangaliev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
