Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Date
Msg-id 20180408024939.wyyc4zynvwe4rrwl@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Support partition pruning at execution time
> 
> Buildfarm member lapwing doesn't like this.  I can reproduce the
> failures here by setting force_parallel_mode = regress.  Kind
> of looks like instrumentation counts aren't getting propagated
> from workers back to the leader?

This theory seems correct; the counters are getting incremented, yet
explain later prints them as zero.  What is the code that is supposed to
propagate the instrumentation counts?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christophe Pettus
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks dataloss at least on XFS