On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 07:13:36PM -0500, Jerry Sievers wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Is it possible that pg_upgrade used 50M xids while upgrading?
>
> Hi Bruce.
>
> Don't think so, as I did just snap the safety snap and ran another
> upgrade on that.
>
> And I also compared txid_current for the upgraded snap and our running
> production instance.
>
> The freshly upgraded snap is ~50M txids behind the prod instance.
Are the objects 50M behind or is txid_current 50M different? Higher or
lower?
>
> If this is a not too uncommon case of users running amok, then this time
> in particular they really went off the charts :-)
I have never heard of this problem.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
