Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id 20180403143736.z42lxviikrf4iyxc@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra wrote:

> Yes, that is a good point actually - we need to test that replication
> between PG10 and PG11 works correctly, i.e. that the protocol version is
> correctly negotiated, and features are disabled/enabled accordingly etc.

Maybe it'd be good to have a buildfarm animal to specifically test for
that?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions