Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
Date
Msg-id 20180329184351.q7ur2i77yx7blphb@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-committers
Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2018-03-29 15:20:58 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andres Freund wrote:
> > 
> > > Could we add INSTALL to the all target in src/docs/sgml? It's a bit
> > > awkward that one can build the docs and miss such a mistake. It's fast
> > > to build in comparison to the rest of the docs, so that doesn't seem
> > > like a high price?
> > 
> > Maybe it can be tested for in "make check"?  That's probably even
> > faster.
> 
> Hm, what's wrong just doing it in the normal build? It's a desired build
> artifact, so I really don't see any argument for not building it by
> default?  Don't quite see what the advantage of doing it during make
> check would be?

I meant running something that would check that the file compiles,
without actually producing the output.  For the regular docs, there's a
couple of orders of magnitude of difference in time to do the check vs.
the actual build.

It takes 1.2 second to build for me FWIW, so it's not like it's a huge
time waste anyhow.  Probably more than what will ever be saved has
already been spent in this conversation :-)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: pgsql: README change: update for hash access method
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: pgsql: C comments: "a" <--> "an" corrections