On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Tom Lane wrote:
>Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> I'm not sure of the support status for Solaris 11. We don't have any
>> buildfarm member for that, much less the 11.4 beta. Maybe this is a
>> problem in the OS, or the compiler? I can't see siglongjmp() failing in
>> this way being a Postgres bug, frankly ...
>
>I think the key thing in this stack trace is
>
>>> ffffffe0b083a921 postgres`errfinish+0x260(0, 0, 0, 1fff248dfa8960, 0, 20000034b4a85be0)
>>> ffffffe0b083aa21 check_stack_depth+0x114(20000034b4a86320, 20000034b4a86520, 20000034b4a865a0, 0, 800000, 0)
>>> ffffffe0b083aaf1 transformExprRecurse+0x44(20000034b4a865a0, 20000034b4a86320, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>
>That is, we died while trying to throw an error out of check_stack_depth,
>which suggests that we were in recursion trouble. Either that or
>something's broken about the stack depth test. The most plausible theory
>about why siglongjmp failed is that it SIGSEGV'd against the end of the
>stack, which would also imply something's broken about the stack depth
>test, because it ought to trigger well before we actually run out of
>stack.
>
>Does Solaris even have getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK)? If so, does it tell the
>truth on this beta version?
>
>It'd be interesting to know which regression test query failed. If it was
>anything other than the intentional infinite_recurse call, then there's
>something else wrong too.
>
> regards, tom lane
Seems like I had ADI protection for stack on when building postgres 10.3...
https://swisdev.oracle.com/_files/What-Is-ADI.html
I get "All 178 tests passed." when ADI stack protection is off.
