Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views
Date
Msg-id 20180328.154509.1105757602283768032.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views  (Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> I found the previous patch was broken and this can't handle
>> views that has subqueries as bellow;
>> 
>>  CREATE VIEW lock_view6 AS SELECT * from (select * from lock_tbl1) sub;
>> 
>> I fixed this and attached the updated version including additional tests.
> 
> This patch gives a warning while compiling:
> 
> lockcmds.c:186:1: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
>  } LockViewRecurse_context;
>  ^

Also I get a regression test failure:

*** /usr/local/src/pgsql/current/postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/lock.out    2018-03-28 15:24:13.805314577 +0900
--- /usr/local/src/pgsql/current/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/lock.out    2018-03-28 15:42:07.975592594 +0900
***************
*** 118,124 ****
  ------------
   lock_tbl1
   lock_view6
! (2 rows)
  
  ROLLBACK;
  -- Verify that we can lock a table with inheritance children.
--- 118,125 ----
  ------------
   lock_tbl1
   lock_view6
!  mvtest_tm
! (3 rows)

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing WAL Header to reduce contention duringReserveXLogInsertLocation()