Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication
Date
Msg-id 20180316012436.sfok6b3bkdwt3r4v@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> > I think this is a worthwhile test, but IMO it should be improved a bit
> > before we include it.  Also, we can come up with a better name for the
> > test surely, not just refer to this particular bug. Maybe "typemap".
> 
> It might be useful if we have the facility of TAP test to check the
> log message and regexp-match the message to the expected string.

Something similar to PostgresNode::issues_sql_like() perhaps?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Lazy hash table for XidInMVCCSnapshot (helps Zipfian abit)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs