Re: Logical decoding on standby - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Logical decoding on standby
Date
Msg-id 20180313014041.pbxth2kthczjfq3d@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Logical decoding on standby  (Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>)
Responses Re: Logical decoding on standby  (Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>)
List pgsql-general
Hi,

On 2018-03-13 01:08:03 +0100, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> On 13 March 2018 00:58:27 CET, Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de> wrote:
> >On 12 March 2018 21:18:22 CET, Andreas Joseph Krogh
> ><andreas@visena.com> wrote:
> >>Anybody knows if $subject will make it into v11?

I can't see it happening for v11, there's not even a CF entry in the
last CF.


> >Why do you think you needs this? 
> >
> >Regards, Andreas
> 
> Let me explain my question. One of the key aspects of logical replication is, that you can define what to replicate.
Thatwouldn't work in this way, that's why i'm asking.
 

The subject said logical decoding, not replication. There's a lot of
change data capture type workloads where decoding from the standby is
quite useful. And the design definitely would work for that, we've
explicitly took that into consideration.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Sv: Re: Logical decoding on standby
Next
From: matt.figg@internode.on.net
Date:
Subject: Programmatically duplicating a schema