Re: GSOC 2018 proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: GSOC 2018 proposal
Date
Msg-id 20180312082503.GA31289@e733.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to GSOC 2018 proposal  (Charles Cui <charles.cui1984@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GSOC 2018 proposal
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Charles,

> I am currently preparing a proposal for pg_thrift project. I noticed
> that there are several protocols supported by thrift, which ones do we
> have higher priority? I mean which ones I need to implement during
> this project?

Binary protocols, i.e. TBinaryProtocol and TCompactProtocol. The first
one is a bit faster but more redundant, the second one is slower but
more compact. It's your choice which one to implement first, but at
least one binary protocol should be fully supported (ideally - both).

As far as I'm aware other protocols are rarely used and are not fully
implemented in most existing libraries.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anthony Bykov
Date:
Subject: Re: Transform for pl/perl
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries