Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table firstalgorithm - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table firstalgorithm
Date
Msg-id 20180306142700.wa2ba3zom22myg5q@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm
List pgsql-hackers
Hello

I haven't read your respective patches yet, but both these threads
brought to memory a patch I proposed a few years ago that I never
completed:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20130124215715.GE4528%40alvh.no-ip.org

In that thread I posted a patch to implement a prioritisation scheme for
autovacuum, based on an equation which was still under discussion when
I abandoned it.  Chris Browne proposed a crazy equation to mix in both
XID age and fraction of dead tuples; probably that idea is worth
studying further.  I tried to implement that in my patch but I probably
didn't do it correctly (because, as I recall, it failed to work as
expected).  Nowadays I think we would also consider the multixact freeze
age, too.

Maybe that's worth giving a quick look in case some of the ideas there
are useful for the patches now being proposed.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE ofpartition key