Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date
Msg-id 20180302043435.GE2259@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:28:54AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-02-01 09:04:57 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I've been testing this a bit further and during a test setup with 4-byte
>> bools I still got regression test failures related to GIN, so it doesn't
>> seem quite ready.  I'll keep working on it.
>
> Are you planning to get this into v11? The CF entry
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/17/1444/
> lists this as "ready for committer" which doesn't seem to jive with the
> above description?

Indeed, this is wrong.  Peter, why did you switch suddendly this patch
as ready for committer?  The patch is waiting for your input as you
mentioned that the GIN portion of this patch series is not completely
baked yet.  So I have switched the patch in this state.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #3)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient