Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg
Date
Msg-id 20180302005020.ppmybylrjl2rowxg@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-03-02 13:48:00 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 10:26, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > FWIW, I've heard numerous people yearn for json*agg
> 
> I guess it'll need to be PG12 for now. I'd imagine string_agg and
> array_agg are more important ones to tick off for now, but I bet many
> people would disagree with that.

Oh, this was definitely not meant as an ask for something done together
with this submission.

Thanks for the quick update.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Documenting PROVE_TESTS in section of TAP tests