On 2018-03-01 18:32:08 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I pushed my proposed fix all the way back to 9.3.
>
> As I said earlier, I couldn't detect a bug of the sort you describe:
>
> a) as I argued in my previous email, no tuple earlier than the
> relfreezexid should survive, because 9.2 did remove those when
> freezing the table.
You're right, I think I was thinking of the < 9.3.x case where
multixacts weren't removed at all.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
