Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date
Msg-id 20180301194824.46ivyszju2ivhlh5@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I still don't think, as commented upon by Tom and me upthread, that we
want this feature in the current form.

Your arguments about layering violations seem to be counteracted by the
fact that ProjectionIsNotChanged() basically appears to do purely
executor work inside inside heapam.c.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Suspicious call of initial_cost_hashjoin()
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries